Lisa Longo


Demand & Supply

It is hard for me to understand the nonsense from my perspective today. Surrounded by peace, beauty and nature, I feel so in tune with our world and then I turn on the news and it is the same silly crap day after day.

It seems surreal. And then it when it hit me, we've had it all wrong, it really isn't supply & demand, it is we have demand what we need to supply.

At the end of the day I am going to hear this same exact bullshit. How some people don't think the rich get enough welfare and those same folks don't want to pay to educate our kids, feed our hungry or care for our disabled vets and elderly. They are going to insist we supply what they demand, more tax cuts for the rich right?

These folks damn well want their share of government handouts, bailouts and entitlements, they simply don't want to share it with the rest of us. And certainly not with the poor.

And we've let them steal our money, our homes and our children's futures. For what? So we can demand they supply us with jobs? That is a hoax. They don't supply jobs. Supply does not create demand. That is a fallacy.

And the new twist, this pap that the Pope is a Communist, which is bad, but Vlad the bad Putin, who is actually a Communist is a "strong world leader" and is good, and who along with China is "winning", while our President, who actually stopped the "free for all" trickle down market from collapsing into utter depression, is a "weak leader from behind socialist" but it was Obama who actually increased the wealth of this country using capitalism.


And I keep thinking, how long until people realize how powerful they are? How powerful one voice, one person really is? And then they realize the implacable force we would be if we came together and we started making demands. WE could do anything if we really wanted it and were willing to fight for it and show up. When we supply the passion and perseverance, our demands will be heard.

Things like preserving our planet and feeding the hungry, caring for the ill and our elderly and honoring and providing for our Veteran's. We can do that. We can do all of that and so much more.

I mean, we really are winning. Here in my hometown I fought for two years to ensure our two new schools would have geothermal. And they will. And now our school district rejected more tax breaks for a development that would simply provide more profits to private corporations at the expense of taxpayers.

What if we do this in school districts and municipalities nationwide? What if we reject fossil fuels in our schools? What if we demand renewable energy options? What happens then? What happens when we reduce demand? Guess what happens to the supply? What happens the day after we realize it all belongs to us?

What happens when we insist on building with solar? When we DEMAND that? What happens when we stop allowing our tax dollars to be gifted to real estate developers and we instead put that money into our schools and provide more public jobs?

Do you know how powerful we are?

I think when you start making demands you are going to find out, and I am happy to supply the inspiration.


Filed under: We Start Here No Comments

“Don’t Tell Me What You Value, Show Me Your Budget And I’ll Tell You What You Value”

So said our Vice President Joe Biden and how very true these words are. today

What do you value? How do we want our tax dollars spent? These are important questions, and you absolutely have a say. Don’t believe all the hype and rhetoric. EVERY vote does count. EVERY voice is heard. But there is a catch. You have to show up on Election Day and at meetings. As someone once said, if you aren’t at the table, you’re on the menu.

What is in our local budgets? Does it reflect our shared values? For example, the Phoenixville Area School District Administration has “recommended” that an additional $1.6 million be spent on three artificial turf fields at the new Elementary School and Early Learning Center site. They will also be asking for another $3.1 million for upgrades to Washington Field, which already has an artificial turf field. One of the two the district already has and which they have been funding a reserve to replace at $200,000 per year for the last few years. An amount we found out recently is way too high.

Just these “recommendations” and reserves total approximately $5 million dollars.

And what don’t they want? What do they think is not worth spending on? First of all, the district administration recommended eliminating a playground for the elementary students. Seriously, they said the students can play on the artificial turf field. Note it is one specific field, and only when not in use for athletics or PE class or other unspecified uses. And second, the district administration is also suggesting that while $5 million on athletic facilities and fields is necessary, the geothermal system is not “worth it” because their one analysis, based on questionable data, shows a payback of 27 years.

The truth is the geothermal could have a payback to taxpayers in as few as 6 years. But the question I have is, if geothermal is going to cost taxpayers approximately $500,000 more than a natural gas system and will absolutely save taxpayers money every day and the sports fields and facilities are going to cost $5,000,000 and cost taxpayers money every day, which is the wiser choice?

Looking at this, what does the Phoenixville Area School District value?

As a candidate for PASD school board I am committed to protecting taxpayers and ensuring taxes are spent as wisely as possible and with a long-term strategic plan in mind. We need a balanced budget that reflects and protects our shared values. This is why I will be at the PASD Building & Grounds Committee meeting on August 24th at 7pm and the final special Board meeting on September 3rd. As the only non-incumbent candidate who has been attending these meetings for the last three years, I will continue to be the voice for the taxpayers.


Dirty Politics in a Small Town

Why don’t people get involved with politics? Have you seen what goes on? The nastiness, misinformation, innuendo and sometimes outright lies. And because no good deed ever goes unpunished and many fold in the face of such unjustified criticism.  Let me tell you about my own experience in small town/large state local politics. I live in a town near Valley Forge National Park. It is a beautiful place, lots of good restaurants, some fantastic shops and a great theater.  In 2007 I was offered the opportunity to open a new business with five other investors called Earth Mart. The mission of Earth Mart was to offer consumers shopping options that were local and American made, fair trade produced, recycled and organic.

There were six total investors and I was not involved in the day to day operations until right before we moved from Phoenixville. We had a full-time store manager and a part-time administrator who did the books and who was supposed to take care of the taxes, both sales and payroll. Earth Mart did a fantastic business, even with the economic collapse. But then the construction industry went into freefall and Earth Mart was impacted. When the market changed one of the major investors decided to back out, owing the company over $300,000. As you can imagine, this was a true hardship. The rent was very high, and after a failed negotiation for a lower rent (we were paying $7,000 per month), the decision was made to move the business to three new locations.

Fast forward to 2012 (and soon you will see how the above factors in this story). I decided to run for school board of my wonderful little town. We have great schools (7th Most Challenging High School in PA according to The Washington Post) and I wanted to help make them even better. I started attending school board meetings. In 2013 I was a candidate for the first time and wow did I learn about the nasty side of local politics. I was totally unprepared for what happened.

On Election Day I received a call from a friend. She had arrived at her polling place to vote and was “greeted” by what she described to me as a “raving nut job”. She said this man asked her if she “planned to vote for Lisa Longo” and when she said yes he started yelling and ranting, saying she “couldn’t” vote for Lisa Longo and spewing all kinds of silly nonsense. He harassed her as she tried to walk to the door, and according to what she told me, he continued following her and yelling at her right up to the door. All of which is a violation of election rules on what you can do at the polling places.

My friend called me as soon as she left the polls and she told me she saw him doing this to other voters as well. Another friend called to tell me that in her neighborhood two men were going door to door in the days before the election and they seemed to be “targeting [her] elderly neighbors”, she told me she asked her neighbor about it and was told they were saying that “Longo” was going to “double taxes” if elected and they would “lose their homes” if “she gets elected”. And several people told me calls were being made with this same unbelievable message.

Now this was so silly you would ask yourself, who would believe it? Not many I hope, and I doubt it had much of an impact. I lost that election by only 63 votes. To put that in context the last person who ran lost by about 1,000 votes. But even though their silly machinations weren’t very effective, they do expose just how far some people will go.

I did not allow my election loss to prevent me from serving my community. I served on the Community Budget Advisory Committee and continued attending school board meetings. Time passed and now the school board position is open again. Since I lost the election by only 63 votes I thought I would give it another try. This time I would explain to voters that I was not going to raise their taxes. Instead I would use my financial expertise to stretch their tax dollars. But now I hear there is a new attack plan. The plan is going to attempt to paint me as someone who shirked paying her taxes. And it all started with an "anonymous" tip to a local paper. The paper isn't saying who made the tip, but the timing is slightly suspicious, read the article here.

It goes back to my business partnership in Earth Mart. Apparently a manager had filed some returns late or incorrectly and may not have filed all the required paperwork or returns. Although they are trying to paint a picture that we owe back taxes, my research shows that while the sales tax was paid there are outstanding penalty and interest not tax. The other issue seems to be with returns that may have been filed incorrectly or that were not filed. Again, I was not the one doing the bookkeeping, it would have been a conflict of interest as an investor. As soon as I was informed of this I began to look into it. Needless to say, I will not let this latest onslaught dissuade me from my campaign. It will be worth all the effort to help ensure our community has the best school system to maximize the potential and opportunity for every student.

I believe this is a non-issue. It has nothing to do with school board, the fact that this anonymous person is trying to smear my reputation is a cowardly act. But it is how some people want to win, it doesn’t matter how. And that is what I call dirty politics.


We are All Infected

Every single one of us. We all have it. No one is immune. And no one gets out alive. And we all know it. We like to pretend it isn’t so. We fill our days and nights with distractions. We try to ignore it. We go to elaborate lengths to deny it. We hide from it. We Botox the signs, erase the lines. Trim it, tuck it, suck it out and lift it. We run from the truth that life is terminal. But we are all infected.

And at the end of the day, there is no denying it. There is no escaping this self-evident truth. There is no grand bargain to be made. No deal with any devil . There is no white knight coming to bestow everlasting life on us. We don’t get second chances at this. We get one shot. One life. Just one. So ask yourself, why the hell are we allowing it to be so hellish for so many?

Why aren’t we all protesting the rampant injustice and revolting inequities of our system? How did “they” get us all to stand by like sheep while the banksters stole our retirement, hijacked our children’s futures and those self-same market makers who told Congress they had no fiduciary duty to safeguard our life savings played economic roulette with the fruits of our labor?

How did we become zombies more concerned with who wins some stupid reality show or silly game than with who is running our school districts and Judicial system? How did our national psyche get so perverted we care more about some woman who “broke” the internet with a photo of her bottom than we do about how companies are corrupting and contaminating our planet while they are manipulating their bottom lines and hiding billions in offshore banks while bilking taxpayers for their welfare entitlements, mansions and yachts?

Why are we allowing schools to do random searches, breathalyze students and have practices on how to hide from random shooters, but we can’t have background checks or basic safety regulation for the guns used to massacre and create havoc? How is it that state legislatures can insist they have every right to infringe on any woman’s rights while they pay us less but we have no right to see who is paying for the right to influence our members of Congress? We are teaching our children to be afraid of possibilities while their opportunities are being shut down and we allow our students to be indentured and indebted to the banks that are too big to fail but not too greedy to steal their futures. We teach our children to accept unconstitutional searches and seizures while we deny medical marijuana for the treatment of actual seizures and push for-profit everything to maximize the misery of the many so the few can get even richer.

And if all this isn’t enough to make you sick, I’m here to tell you, the decay is accelerating. It seems as if the rot is spreading its putrid pestilence as we allow institutionalized poverty to pervade our humanity. We’ve created a monster with horrific capabilities and catastrophic economic implications.

And to what end? What does it matter? Since we are all infected what is to be gained by those few who are amassing great wealth at grievous cost to the greater majority of us? Do they get to live longer? Maybe. But make no mistake, they are definitely getting to live better. With more dignity. More leisure. More ease and comfort. They live behind their walls with paid protection and plenty of everything to ease their dying days. This isn’t about “hating” the rich. Or wanting a redistribution of wealth. It is about life. And death. And what happens in between. Because we are all indeed infected.

And I think this is why I’ve been so fascinated by The Walking Dead. The show that shows the figurative interpretation of modern life in the time of an apocalyptic event. There is no denying the inevitable misery of life in this noir tale. Or the everlasting reality of death. The fight for survival we can never win for long it seems. And it is a metaphor for what we have allowed our world to become.

We are indeed the walking dead. Zombies blindly shuffling down roads, through broken cities and abandoned towns. Staring at meaningless boxes, hearing the monotonous moans of the drones, the hateful screeches of the frightened running from the death that will take us all. Because we are all infected.


More Questions And Lies About Romney And The Olympics

It would seem all is not as it appears in the Mitt Romney fairy tale about his “success” as CEO of the Salt Lake City Olympic Committee. Such a twisted yarn this has become; from his fictional exit as head of Bain Capital to his being the “savior” of the 2002 Salt Lake City Games.

Starting with his supposed exit from Bain to be CEO of the 2002 Salt Lake City Olympic Committee, how is it that the CEO of a successful company, who owned 100% of a venture capital firm, had nothing to do with the decision-making or policies of this firm? This same company which went from trying to help businesses succeed, to borrowing against assets to profiting from their failure. In addition, this firm actively looked to move manufacturing overseas to countries known for using slave and child labor, one can assume to cut costs and increase profits for its privateer profit-monger partners.

And then this CEO and Chairman of the Board was asked to ride to the “rescue” the 2002 Olympic games. This was in 1999. The “abrupt” departure from the venture capital firm did not allow this shrewd businessman or his many staff, partners, consultants, lawyers, managers, accountants and MBA’s to figure out a way to document his departure.

Evidently, their combined net worth, education and experience did not give them the ability to file a few simple documents correctly. Nor did their business knowledge and success allow them to understand the importance and legality of properly filing forms with the SEC.

Despite this utter lack of professionalism, Mr. Romney was asked to go to Salt Lake City to “rescue” the 2002 Olympic Games. According to many sources the “rescue” was actually a bail-out by our Federal government, as pointed out by Republican Senator John McCain in a speech on September 19, 2000, “However, as outlined, most of the money taken from taxpayers to foot the bill for the Salt Lake games is going to develop, build, and complete major highway and transit improvement projects – “especially those critical to the success of the Olympic Games.” This last phrase is vital to understanding the fleece game being played by cities like Salt Lake...$1.3 billion to Salt Lake City, this is preposterous, and it must stop.”

It would seem the real hero of the 2002 Salt Lake City Olympics was President Bill Clinton and the Federal government, at least according to Senator Bill Bennett (R-UT), “In fact, most of the federal money was already in place before Mitt came on, “said Senator Bob Bennett, “The Clinton Administration was completely supportive in saying these are ‘America’s Games,’ we will do whatever we can to make sure they are successful. The one concern I had was whether we would get the same degree of support from the Bush administration, which we did.”

I wonder if a Romney Administration would be as willing to support such an effort. Evidently Mr. Romney thought government spending was a good thing before he thought it was a bad thing:  “Recognizing that our government spends billions of dollars to maintain wartime capability, it is entirely appropriate to invest several hundred millions to promote peace,” this from an article on

The methods used by Romney the “rescuer” seem to resemble those of a long-time political hack and lobbyist; one might even call it “Chicago” style politics as usual. It would seem Mitt went to business leaders and offered a long-term strategic vision, better known in business terminology as “you scratch my back, and some day when I am elected, I will return the favor”.

Companies like Staples were offered preferential sponsor deals. But wait, wasn’t Staples one of the companies owned by Bain Capital? Would it not be considered insider trading and therefore not only unethical but illegal for the nominal head of Bain Capital to use his position as head of the 2002 Olympic Committee to offer a contract to a company he was heavily invested in personally to assist them in profiting due to his ability to direct business to them? Wait, what?

So here the tale becomes more convoluted. Did Mitt Romney use his dual CEO positions at Bain & the 2002 Olympics to personally and professionally profit? Did he leverage his future political aspirations to gain contributions to the games with promises of future legislative favors? Was his position as “savior” of the games the total fiction it appears to be, as described by two prominent Republican legislators? And finally, did Mitt Romney use insider knowledge to give his investment the inside track on sponsor and business contracts, in violation of SEC and other regulations?

Many accounts of the transition to Romney management of the 2002 games include numerous quotes from those involved who were disgusted by the heavy-handed egomaniacal management style Mr. Romney displayed. One example of such are the buttons Mr. Romney approved, one showing his image and sporting slogans such as, “Hey Mitt, we love you.”

As one former Salt Lake City council member was quoted as saying, “Mitt could have been a hero if he had just come in and been polite. What turned me sour was his demand to get all the credit and ignore everybody who had put in thousands of hours before he arrived.”

It would seem that this successful CEO used his private position to gain a public position to further his political aspirations, using his position to leverage favors and seemingly, coerce cooperation and contributions. Not quite the white knight or business leader we have been told about.

I don’t know about you, but in my mind, Mitt has earned himself a perfect 10, and he deserves a gold medal for being a liar.


(Originally posted in July 2012)


A Tale of Two Tax Cuts

A Tale of Two Tax Cuts

“Tax cuts to the rich create jobs”. “Tax cuts for the working poor and middle class stimulate the economy”. Only one of these is true, and it is time to figure out which. And we can, using some basic math.

Is taxing the rich socialism? Is it “un-American” to ask the rich to pay more taxes? Or is income inequality at the root of our economic problem? And how can we know which is the “right” theory? On the one hand you have Democrats calling for an increase to the minimum wage, affordable health care for all and an increase in both the benefit and wage base of the Social Security system as a method of putting more money on “Main Street” to stimulate the economy. On the other side you have Republicans insisting we give more money to “Wall Street” and just saying no to everything until they get their way.

In order to decide who is really “right”, I decided to do some math. I find that when I can break an argument down to mathematical components it provides useful data to help me understand the issues better.

Here are some computations and assumptions for this problem:

An average family needs to make approximately $4,000 per month, net of taxes to cover all expenses. That comes to $23.08 per hour net, which is $27.69 gross for a base hourly wage if we assume average taxes paid equal 20%.

That is the minimum wage at which a person does not “need” any assistance to pay for living, insurance, food, transportation and health care. It does not include saving for retirement, vacations or other expenses that are “discretionary”, for example vacations, gifts, going out to dinner or the movies, buying clothes or getting your hair cut or nails done. And forget about getting sick and not being able to work, republicans don’t want paid sick leave either.

Now, let’s compare discretionary income and how taxes work, and how a tax cut or increase impacts different income levels:

tax charg

What happens when we change those rates just slightly, say, reduce taxes 1% for the bottom three and increase taxes 3% on the top? Whoa, pretty amazing result. While very little goes to the bottom three as a result the additional tax revenue generated is pretty significant.

what happens

Wow, look at that, we just put more money in the pockets of those who “need” it and will spend it and still left the top earner with more than half a million in annual discretionary income. Pretty clear results don’t you think?

While it is true this is type of progressive taxation moves a larger share of the tax “burden” to the wealthy, and republicans will try to tell you that is socialism and “bad”, it is actually simple math. The “top” earner still has almost 45 times the discretionary income of the “lowest”. No one is suggesting we take “all” the wealth and redistribute it, the math simply proves that balancing the books on the backs of the poor does not make sense.

And asking the rich to pay a little more so we can protect our way life and improve our standard of living makes economic sense. And that is the role of government, to protect and provide for our national security, and that includes economic stability.

We as a society have decided to pay for certain common good items; roads, schools, military, parks, etc. The decision to be made is do we want to do this in a balanced way or an imbalanced way? Do we want to provide a living wage or do we want to provide massive social and corporate welfare? That is the question. If you look at this as a mathematical problem, the answer is clear the “minimum” wage would be the baseline at which anyone working full-time would not need any government assistance.

That is the essence of capitalism, operating within the “market” wages would be set by the cost of living. Simple isn’t it? Workers need to be able to afford to live and buy products or the economy does not work.

What we are currently doing is a perversion of the system of capitalism. We have socialized corporate operating costs and moved the risk, and the tax burden, from the company to the taxpayer. Republicans call this the “free” market. But it is not free. The cost to taxpayers is astronomical.

And in fact, the greatest redistribution of wealth has been under republican theories of economics. The scam known as “trickle down” economics is at its core tragically flawed. Where once workers were paid a fair wage and had lifetime benefits including pensions and healthcare, Ronnie Reagan and his democratization of money doctrine conned, I mean, convinced, American workers to give up their pensions. How? Well, they told workers they “deserved” to “invest their money, just like the rich”, and that all the billions corporations would save would just “trickle down” to workers.

How’d that work out so far?

I think the math pretty clearly shows that in this tale of two tax cuts, the correct tax cut are to the working poor and middle class not the rich. So the next time a conservative tries to tell you tax cuts to the rich are good for everyone because the benefit will “trickle down”, tell her to go do some math.


Civil Dissonance

I’ve been thinking a lot about the world we’ve created. And I’ve come to the conclusion that it makes absolutely no sense. None. Not even a little. We have created a society based on a system of dichotomies and fallacies. And that is truly absurd. And there really wasn’t a name for what I was thinking. I needed a new phrase. And then it came to me, “civil dissonance”.

What is civil dissonance? It is the concept that we have allowed a system of government that is not beneficial to most humans, their welfare or life itself, and this dichotomous system has replaced the system we started with, you know, the one that allowed for “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness”.

Similar to cognitive dissonance, which, according to Merriam-Webster is the “…psychological conflict resulting from simultaneously held incongruous beliefs and attitudes (as a fondness for smoking and a belief that it is harmful)”; civil dissonance is the societal conflict resulting from simultaneously held incongruous beliefs and attitudes, such as a belief in improving the standard of living for all but refusing to increase the minimum wage and lift millions out of poverty, or the inability to provide health care for all because that is too expensive while providing billions in tax welfare to the already rich and corporations.

Civil dissonance is the recognition that we are no longer acting in our own best interest. It is acknowledging we’ve allowed a system of entitlement for those who don’t need it, while those who do need it are demonized or ignored.

Civil dissonance is the conflict that results from creating a government and laws which work against our very survival and self-interest. It is allowing a wage that creates poverty while saying poverty is bad. It is creating a need for more social welfare programs, which create higher taxes while people continue to vote for “small government less taxes” and at the same time refuse to increase wages and therefore reduce social welfare programs which reduces taxes. It is electing people who don’t believe in government to run our government. It is taking our public funds, which once created good paying middle class jobs and allowing outsourcing and privatization to convert them into low wage jobs that create a need for higher taxes by creating poverty and a need for social welfare.

Why is a dollar spent on social programs bad, but that same dollar given to private enterprise somehow good? People say that it is competition which lowers prices, but the profit motive isn’t about lowering prices, it is about making money. It has always been the public sector, not the private, that has been most concerned with keeping costs low because of the fiduciary duty to taxpayers.

We’ve been convinced that regulation is bad and government worse. It makes no sense. Our society is actually based on the regulation and creation of capital and self –governance, you know that whole government for, by and of the people. Capitalism isn’t the absence of regulation and Democracy isn’t the absence of government.

Civil dissonance is related to cognitive dissonance, but while one is a private and personal issue, the other is a very public and societal issue, and it is ruining our world.

There is a solution to this conflict. We can stop electing people who want to dismantle our government and defund education, social welfare and environmental protections. We can insist on income equality and social justice for all. We can create a world that provides for the care and security of us all. You know, not only the whole love your neighbor, care for the weak, sick and elderly, but provide for our national security and preservation of our way of life.

Also known as being a patriot.

The first step is to increase the minimum wage. In a truly free market economy no one would work for less than basic subsistence required. A wage that creates poverty is not acceptable, it is not patriotic and it is certainly not good for our economy. A wage that creates poverty also creates human suffering as well as creating a need for higher taxes, that is not patriotic, that is not sustainable, that is not beneficial to our society. That is civil dissonance.


Copyright 2015 Lisa Longo All rights reserved


Why I Am A Fiscal Conservative

Why I Am A Fiscal Conservative

Author: July 17, 2012 9:13 pm

Who me? Really. Absolutely. I am all for a balanced budget and enhanced national security. I think we need to absolutely balance our budget, by passing legislation, for example the Fair and Balance Budget Act: for every dollar we gift a corporation as a subsidy, one dollar to education. For every dollar to defense, one to health & welfare. Every dollar to fossil fuel companies, one to renewable energy companies. And every dollar to animal based agriculture, one to plant-based. Now that is a balanced budegt.

And that is why I believe the only true conservative and responsible national policy is health care reform that will be self-funding. How? First, we must resolve ourselves to the reality of a national health care system. And we must accept the need for federal guidelines on wages for all public service employees, including teachers, police, firefighters, doctors, nurses, hospital staff & technicians, and most importantly, congressional members and their staff. Same pay, same benefits. Except combat troops, who would be paid double when in harm’s way.

That’s right, let’s use the same pay scale, based upon education, experience and performance for all public employees. I’d also add a phase out for anyone with a certain amount of passive income. They would opt out of all publicly funded pensions, and receive nominal compensation, based upon the amount of annual passive income they receive.

Second, change Social Security to the Social Security, Health and Education fund. Simple changes to our current social security funding mechanism will allow us to fully fund Social Security, health care and education. First, raise the wage base for the payroll tax to $5,000,000, or do away with the wage base altogether. This has the added benefit of taking away the tax welfare incentive for excessive executive compensation. We create the Social Security, Health & Education fund, establishing an endowment that will self-fund the administrative costs, and allow for cost increases over time. The fund will not be managed by an Investment Bank per se, but by a public non-profit that will invest the funds for the public good and manage returns in the public interest.

Third, we will ensure the balanced budget is resolved by utilizing current tax law and not by establishing any new taxes. First, we will limit tax deductions for executive compensation & benefits to average employee compensation and tax the excess as a dividend. Next, we will limit tax deductions for travel & entertainment to federal per diem, again taxing the excess as a dividend.

This is how our system worked for decades, until Reagan and his “democratization of money”, that was the beginning of the end. (See my earlier essay, How Trickle Down Theory Is Ruining Our Schools And Closing Our Libraries, Thank You Ronald Reagan)
Last, each of us must resolve to contribute not only financially via taxes, but intellectually to our political system. We must fight to add civics, ethics, government, economics and public policy classes as requirements at every level of education.

We need to ensure participation in our democratic process by addressing low voter turnout and working to increase the number of voters at every level. We need to become a citizen lobby and remember, this country was founded by community organizers. We need to draft legislation to protect our rights, for example, in order to protect our civil rights and constitutionally mandated 2nd amendment rights, we need to ensure adherence to the spirit of the law, and ensure the right to bear arms is equated with an educated and registered “militia,” by insisting gun owners register as a part of an actual militia, like the National Guard for training and annual license.

There is not a dichotomy in my stance as a socially liberal progressive fiscal conservative feminist. So go ahead, call me a fiscal conservative. I welcome it.


The True Cost of Cheap Sh$t

How does the economy work and what does the minimum wage have to do with anything? Well, it is a very simple, and a very complicated, question.

Let’s start with the simple part.

I’ve done a talk called “The True Cost of Cheap Sh$t”, and in it, I use the example of socks.

You can buy a bag of a dozen socks at a big box store like a Wal-Mart, for $11.64. That is less than $1 per pair. Now, to maintain those low, low prices, Wal-Mart has to have some basic policies so they can afford to profit while selling such cheap socks. The people who work at Wal-Mart therefore can’t make very much, many make just above minimum wage and many don’t have health care, sick or vacation days, pensions or other benefits.

So how do they do it? And how do their employees live on that low wage? Well, this is where it gets a little complicated, the cost for the low wages, and those low, low prices, are paid by taxpayers, to the tune of $6.2 BILLION a year. (

So wow, those socks just got pretty expensive didn’t they?

Now let’s look at the alternative. A pair of organic cotton socks made in the USA, and let’s say they are $6.00 per pair. ( They are likely of a much better quality, and will last longer, so you really don’t need to buy 12, you might be able to get buy with just 6, making the total $36.

Now, the employees who work for a company like this likely make more than the minimum wage, would have medical and other benefits and save taxpayers those billions we have to pay for the low, low prices at Wal-Mart. So, no $6.2 billion in annual welfare needed here.

Let’s figure out the true cost of those cheap socks. Each of the estimated 138 million US taxpayers has to pay an annual tax of $44.93 to cover just the costs we subsidize Wal-Mart for welfare to its workers. And by some estimates various forms of corporate welfare entitlement s cost taxpayers $3,000 to $4,000 each per year. So those socks you thought were less than a dollar? They don’t seem so cheap now do they?

Even those of us who don’t shop at Wal-Mart pay the price for their low prices. So, tell me what is the true cost of cheap sh$t? We haven’t even begun to factor in the societal costs, loss of dignity, lower standard of living, decreased longevity, raging income inequality. That is going to take a much longer blog. But just in the loss of human dignity and humanity, I’d say the cost of cheap sh$t is actually incalculable and much too expensive.


What A Wonderful Day That Will Be

Another pipeline is leaking and people are being evacuated. More land is being contaminated.

Meanwhile, the Scotland Independence vote of course has drilling & extraction at its core. And the money I bet that is fueling that most, is right from the fossil fuel fools.

Here at home we have kids without books, winter coming and they don't have coats. We have Vets killing themselves and the mentally ill allowed to buy guns and unlimited ammo.

Meanwhile our friends on the right keep telling us the problem is poor people, never mind that they created the great vast poverty that engulfs us. Never mind that the poverty wage they bestow upon their corporate sponsors is costing taxpayers trillions and creating an inequality that is killing the American dream.  Never mind that they refuse to lower interest rates, forgive debt or help the people, they are too busy helping the rich, they need another tax break or they won't not create any jobs.

They don't care, because the election comes and people everywhere say, oh, but that's politics. What do I care? The game is coming on, be quiet. Or I have to work. I'm too busy. I don't care. My vote doesn't matter. The system is broken. Its all corrupt. Why should I bother?

And so we all dig deep in our pockets to help the poor, the hungry, the ill and the aged. Keeping our own economies unequal, never mind the right shoveling our cash to the rich, they have to have tax breaks they tell us, to create jobs, as we watch the middle class disappear.

My feelings turn to despair, which in turn creates in me an anger and I begin to despise the superficial arrogance of the many for ignoring what the few are doing right in front of them. Because make no mistake, this is going on RIGHT in front of you.

When all of you are really as sick of this as you say, you will rise up and take back what is yours. Your money, your homes, your savings, your children's futures. Our land, water and air.

The real revolution happens every year on election day. And one day, I'm going to see millions of American's finally realize that we had the power all along and act accordingly.

What a wonderful day that will be.

Filed under: We Start Here No Comments